4 Points to Consider when Building a Speakers’ Bureau

Speakers are one of the most promising methods of influencing prescribers. They are often clinicians who have experience with a product and, coupled with their scientific training, have the know-how to determine how to guide their colleagues who may have less experience with the product. Peer-to-peer works. This is why companies spend hundreds of millions of dollars annually managing speakers’ bureaus. Managing your bureau with impact is crucial for conducting successful speaker programs.

In this article, you’ll find a quick rundown along with clips from our recent educational webinar concerning many of the key points and questions you’ll encounter while building a speakers’ bureau. 

Speakers vs. KOLs

Is there a difference between speakers and KOLs? Although we are all probably guilty of using the terms interchangeably, there is a distinct difference. It’s the “O” and “L” that marks this distinction. These people are opinion leaders for a reason. They’re people who are going to have influence over treatment protocols or disease state treatments and typically try to work with others from a managed care perspective.

With KOLs, there’s more an indirect kind of sales effort going on. You know these people are probably members of key associations, most likely with leadership positions within their therapeutic area. On top of that, a lot of KOLs are also advisory board members for those associations or maybe for your company. 

Speakers, on the other hand, are doing what can be thought of as more direct peer to peer selling. What this means is your company is going to give them some approved content, whether it be a key selling message or slide decks. Speakers are ones you’ve got to look at concerning their skill sets. They have good presentation skills, but can they handle interactive components like live polling and Q&A? These are skills that also need to be brought into consideration.

Identifying the Right KOLs

Identifying the right speakers and getting them into your organization is not always easy. Sometimes the person you really need to be working with is someone you don’t know, someone you have no established relationship with. To mitigate this, Tim Dembinski of Pfizer Injectables consults a third-party to discover who’s out there and to create an initial list before using his internal teams to help vet that initial list, resulting in a robust and balanced speakers’ bureau. 

“Depending on where your product is in its life-cycle, those three buckets of field sales, medical and scientific affairs and clinical may take on more importance to how you decide who you want on your speakers bureau,” Dembinski said. 

Perhaps you have a new indication and you need a KOL who can speak to and explain the science behind it. In that case you’re going to rely on the feedback from your clinical and R&D team. On the other hand, if the information you wish to communicate is more community based, then your field sales and medical affairs teams are going to be much more familiar with who’s going to be a better fit. 

Right-Sizing Your Bureau

Essentially there are two ways to build a speakers’ bureau. You can work with an existing bureau or build a new one from the ground up. What is best for your organization depends on a few different factors. Work with your compliance department is necessary as there may be certain strategies that can or cannot be done depending on your organization’s compliance team. 

From the ground up you have the advantage of being able to build relationships with your speakers from the beginning. Typically in this scenario there’s a new product being launched, bringing with it a fresh sense of eagerness and excitement. New faces among your bureau, bringing with them new perspectives and insights, are an organic, natural part of the new product launch process.

“Over time, the years you spend with those folks, how the product grows and the market develops and how patients are helped with proper use of your product and the information you’re sharing, it is very satisfying,” Dembinski said. 

At this stage the question that soon gets asked is “how many?” The answer depends on your peer-to-peer budget and how many speakers you can keep active. You may want 100 speakers, but when you look at your budget, is there enough to keep 100 speakers active? Certain companies will require a set amount of speaking engagements for each speaker or that speaker must be removed from the bureau. That’s why this question must be asked early. Nothing is more difficult than having too many speakers and never utilizing them, which leads to frustration for all parties involved. Continue to scrub your bureau regularly, look at who is effective and who may need to be replaced. 

When inheriting an existing bureau, these same considerations of budget and effectiveness need to be made. 

“When I took over the diabetes bureau at Takeda we had over 1150 speakers,” V2V president Dan Rehal said. “I had an ROI analysis done. We had 90% of speakers providing no benefit to the organization whatsoever.” 

As a result the bureau was shrunk from over 1100 speakers down to just 400, a massive shift, but doing so allowed for the creation of a more effective plan to utilize the speakers who were effective and providing benefit. 

Difference in Training Impact

Once you’ve got your bureau to the ideal size, there are things that need to be done to take that bureau to the next level. In this day and age there are 3 core training strategies: On-Demand, Live In-Person training and Virtual Live training. 

From a budgetary standpoint, On-Demand is going to be the least expensive. Virtual training is the next step up and live in-person training will be the most expensive. But which is the most cost-effective?

All three can be effective in the right scenario and each will probably be used by almost any brand in some capacity. Live training holds a lot of value when building a new speakers’ bureau. You’re building new relationships and that live, face-to-face interaction to share the content is invaluable. 

Virtual is typically used a supplement throughout the year. Perhaps you have a new indication and from a budget standpoint it doesn’t make sense to bring everybody back together for a live in-person training. Virtual is a great option in that scenario as it still offers a lot of interactivity and live engagement in a much more convenient setting for your speakers, but at the cost of that face to face interaction.  

On-Demand obviously allows for people to complete the training at their own time, but you lose a lot of the organic interaction that you get in a live setting. 

Now, we want to hear from YOU!
Please leave your comments and or questions in the comments section below.

Recent Posts

Keep it Simple

Protected: HEAR to Reduce Conflict Between Key Opinion Leaders – Dan Recommends

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Read More
KOL ID Case Study

Case Study: KOL Identification in Late-State Clinical Trials

A BioPharma client had an orphan drug used to treat a rare endocrine disorder in late-stage clinical trials, but no existing network of Key Opinion...

Read More
Why Basic Might Be Better

When and Why Simple Might Be Better for KOL ID & Mapping

Identifying and mapping the right Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) is the foundational tactic that lays the groundwork for your peer-to-peer strategies that follow, whether conducting...

Read More